While it may be common for people to bring suits against bloggers, what happens if someone attempts to bring a lawsuit against an anonymous Wikipedia editor?
Attorney Susan Burke brought a defamation lawsuit to reveal two anonymous Wikipedia editors that stated that she had been sanctioned by a federal judge. The editors are identified by their usernames Zujua and CapBasics359. Zujua is fighting the subpoena and was responsible for the edit of Burke's Wikipedia page in 2012, and although CapBasics359 is still unknown, Burke's counsel is aware that CapBasics359 was previously logged in at a Starbucks in California.
While Burke states that her primary reason for bringing the suit is to discover who was editing her Wikipedia page with false information, Zujua's attorney, Christopher Hajec from the Center of Individual Rights claims that as a policy reason, revealing anonymous editors will have a "chilling [of] the free speech rights of other Wikipedia editors who will hesitate to edit on matters of public concern for fear of being sued if they make a mistake."
What do you think? Should anonymous Wikipedia editors be responsible for their edits?
Originally seen on ABAJournal here.
Interesting item. I'm unsure it's Entertainment Law, as opposed to libel or media law. Believe one 'files' suit or just sues (bring? hmm). In Graf 2: editors WHO (not that; they are people) ... Problems in this graf also with passive voice. Who identified them? Burke's attorney, in the suit, says CB359 has not been identified yet but this defendant did log in from a California Starbucks. Graf 3 is wordy; might split the loooong one sentence into two: Burke says she sued to ... But CH, an attorney for Z and of the Center ... says ....
ReplyDeleteIf you don't enable comments, you may wish to abjure from posing rhetorical questions to close a post?